‘Gospel of Jesus’ Wife’ papyrus is a fake fragment, Vatican says Editorial in Holy See’s official newspaper declares it to be a ‘clumsy forgery’

by Steve Ray on September 29, 2012

Like I said a week ago, this had to be a forgery if not a heretical document written by the gnostics back on the 4th century. Catholics should be prepared for repeated reports (assaults) like this.

Here is the article about the Vatican’s comments on the fake document suggesting that Jesus had a wife. 

By Naomi O’Leary


An ancient papyrus fragment which a Harvard scholar says contains the first recorded mention that Jesus may have had a wife is a fake, the Vatican said Friday.

“Substantial reasons would lead one to conclude that the papyrus is indeed a clumsy forgery,” the Vatican’s newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, said in an editorial by its editor, Gian Maria Vian. “In any case, it’s a fake.

Joining a highly charged academic debate over the authenticity of the text, written in ancient Egyptian Coptic, the newspaper published a lengthy analysis by expert Alberto Camplani of Rome’s La Sapienza university, outlining doubts about the manuscript and urging extreme caution.

The fragment, which reads “Jesus said to them, ‘My wife…'” was unveiled by Harvard Professor Karen King as a text from the 4th century at a congress of Coptic Studies in Rome last week.

Her study divided the academic community, with some hailing it as a landmark discovery while others rapidly expressed their doubts

“It’s really pretty unlikely that it’s authentic,” University of Durham Professor Francis Watson told Reuters after he published a paper arguing the words on the fragment were a rearrangement of phrases from a well known Coptic text.

Watson, who has previously worked on identifying forged gospels, said it was likely to be an ancient blank fragment that was written over in the 20th or 21st century by a forger seeking to make money.

Watson argues that the words on the fragment do not fit grammatically into a larger text.

“It’s possible to get hold of an old bit of unwritten-on papyrus and write some new stuff on it,” Watson said. “There is a market for fake antiquities throughout the Middle East … I would guess that in this case the motivation might have been a financial one.”

Academic debate 
Manuscript experts who heard King’s presentation quickly took to their blogs to express doubts, noting that the letters were clumsy, perhaps the script of someone unused to writing Coptic.

Writing from the conference, early Christian scholar Christian Askeland said specialists there were divided between two-thirds who were extremely skeptical, and one-third convinced the fragment was false.

“I have not met anyone who supports its authenticity,” Askeland wrote from a session of the Tenth International Congress of Coptic Studies, where King gave her paper.

In an email to Reuters after the conference ended and before the Vatican editorial, King said: “Whether, in the end, the fragment will be shown to be authentic is still to be finally determined, but the serious conversation among scholars has begun.”

During the conference King stressed that the fragment did not give “any evidence that Jesus was married, or not married” but that early Christians were talking about the possibility.

AnneMarie Luijendijk, associate professor of religion at Princeton University, said she concluded that the fragment was indeed an authentic, ancient text, written by a scribe in antiquity.

“We can see that by the way the ink is preserved on the papyrus and also the way the papyrus has faded and also the way the papyrus has become very fragmentary, which is actually in line with a lot of other papyri we have also from the New Testament,” Luijendijk told Reuters during the conference.

The idea that Jesus was married resurfaces regularly in popular culture, notably with the 2003 publication of Dan Brown’s best-seller “The Da Vinci Code,” which angered the Vatican because, among other things, it was based on the idea that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and had children.

Christian tradition has long held that Jesus was not married and the Catholic Church, by far the largest in Christendom, says women cannot become priests because Christ chose only men as his apostles.

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Bill912 September 30, 2012 at 7:13 AM

Maybe they’ll next claim it was “forged, but accurate”.

Mary Raynah Cagulada June 4, 2019 at 2:59 AM

Steve Ray, Greetings In the name of God. I would just liked to asked that why a lot of other Protestants Christian denomination, I dont know the specific whats their exact denomination that they always make heretical claimed that the Church that is we is not the Bride of Christ? They claimed that The Bride of Christ is a real human woman, that she is the ONLY the Bride of Christ not us we the Church, They claimed also that the Bride of Christ is a divine person like Jesus both God and Man and so does they claimed that the Bride is also both divine and human, she is also part of Trinity God. They do not claimed that St. Mary Magdalene is the Bride cuz she only symbolized, only prefigures the True Human Godess Bride. You can refer to Youtube search the Bride of Christ and you will see hundrends of videos claimed that the Bride of Christ is not the Church. I know Steve Ray that this is heretical beliefs of other Protestants just liked The Da Vinci, I know Protestants every word in the Bible they make it literal even metaphors in the Bible they make it literal they will will used it as man made ideas. Of course not I dont believed it, Im just sad that some Catholics dont even see this and make a video and comment not in a way of debate but just simply tell the Truth is that all of us are The Church, is the Bride of Christ. I just wished that we should also defend this statement cuz This is defender of The Catholic Faith. I thought Christians specf. Protestants dont believed in the The Da Vinci Code but sad to say they are worst than Da Vinci Code. They do not believed that we are all the Bride of Christ, Church is not the Bride of Christ only ONE woman both divine and human according to them. Can u pls helped me defend this statement. I know this is just a small problem because we Catholics already know that The Church We are The Bride of Christ. but align in this blog Da Vinci Code that we are against this, can we also against this heretical fake Bride they claimed?

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: