Embarrassed? They don't like looking stupid? Too much legitimate and justified criticism? Accused of "archaeo-porn"? Why did Discovery Channel pull the 2nd showing of their big money-maker? Why are they keeping mum?
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=11681
Two excellent articles debunking the documentary. Click here.
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
Mirror smashed, returned to sender.
Good that this nonsense is canned.
Could it be they’ve discovered how riddled full of holes these outlandish theories are? I would like to think this to be a demonstration of journalistic responsibility, but in my experience, money usually has more to do with these kinds of decisions. I wonder if that might have something to do with it?
Shane